Beyond Congress: DSA’s Election Night Also Ran Through Tenant Power
DSA’s congressional gains sit alongside tenant victories and local races. Its election-night tally shows both growing reach and unfinished contests.
Apartments under construction in Tacoma’s Hilltop neighborhood, January 20, 2024. Archive photograph; not a depiction of the 2026 ballot campaign. Photo: Joe Mabel / Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 4.0. Photograph source · License
The socialist advance on November 3 reached institutions far below the television map of Congress. Alongside the five new House winners reported by NPR, DSA chapters organized around city government, state legislatures and the rules governing rental housing.
At 1 a.m. Eastern on November 4, Democratic Left reported a national electoral tracker showing 63 wins, 21 losses and one runoff. That was a time-specific organizational count within a much larger field of more than 200 campaigns, with contests still unresolved. The organization’s live account makes the unevenness of the night visible.
Tenant organizing had its own ballot
The same account reported passage of Tacoma’s Safe Homes for All initiative, describing provisions for landlord registration and licensing, enforcement and recognition of tenant unions. The significance lies in the connection between a political campaign and an institution renters can use after the ballots are counted.
A tenant union needs ways to act when a landlord ignores repairs or treats each household as an isolated bargaining partner. An electoral campaign around enforcement can help move that conflict into public view. Implementation then becomes the next organizing terrain: who handles complaints, whether renters know their rights, and whether the city follows through.
That is a different kind of victory from sending another sympathetic legislator to Washington. Both can matter, but local enforcement has a direct relationship to the building where someone lives and the landlord who controls it.
A broader map, with losses on it
Democratic Left also recorded setbacks in Louisville’s mayoral and council races, and a runoff for Austin council candidate Misael Ramos. Those outcomes belong beside the wins. A movement expanding into different political settings needs to know where its organizing is becoming durable and where it remains vulnerable.
DSA’s election guide uses formal endorsement, rather than a candidate’s general sympathy with socialist policies, to define its electoral project. It explicitly excludes Abdul El-Sayed, Troy Jackson and William Lawrence from that category in these contests. Their relationship to the wider left can still be politically important without silently adding them to DSA’s totals.
The congressional breakthroughs give the organization a national platform. The municipal and state campaigns ask a more immediate question: can that visibility help people build lasting power where they work and rent? A chapter that finishes an election with stronger tenant organizations, experienced volunteers and an enforceable local policy has won something a seat count alone cannot describe.
Comments