
Five Kuki-Zo Men Killed as Manipur’s Ethnic War Widens

The Kuki Inpi Manipur, an umbrella civil-society group, accused fighters linked to the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak Muivah and the Zeliangrong United Front-Kamson faction of carrying out the Noney attack. Those groups have not publicly accepted responsibility, and police have not announced who fired the fatal shots. The distinction matters: an allegation cannot become a fact simply because it fits the region’s established lines of conflict.
The killings do establish something more important. Manipur’s authorities have failed to stop armed groups from turning communal borders into killing grounds.

A war with more than one front
Each episode hardens the map of segregation. Roads become borders. Villages become outposts. Families in relief camps remain unable to return home because the state cannot guarantee that a journey across another community’s territory will end safely.
The killing of the three men in Noney triggered protests in Kangpokpi, while massive rallies in Imphal and Senapati made competing demands over ceasefire arrangements between Kuki armed groups and the Indian government. The Economic Times reported that protesters in Imphal called for peace, justice, safe resettlement and the scrapping of the Suspension of Operations agreement.
Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh told the rally: “Community-centric ideas cannot bring integrity, a peaceful atmosphere or economic progress.” His words identify the disease while avoiding the state’s responsibility to treat it.

Protection cannot remain a slogan
That failure sits inside the longer collapse of public authority in Manipur. Police weapons were looted during the 2023 violence. Communities formed armed “village volunteer” networks. Political agreements meant to contain insurgencies now overlap with ethnic demands, local militias and contested districts. Every unresolved pact creates another excuse for leaders to manage the conflict instead of disarming it.
The victims disappear inside competing communal narratives: one side calls them defenders, another calls them militants, and officials use neutral phrases that obscure who controlled the road or who failed to protect it. Their identities matter, but the state’s duty does not change with ethnicity. It must investigate the killings, protect witnesses and prosecute those responsible.
New Delhi and Manipur’s government also owe displaced families more than declarations of normalcy. Safe return requires restored policing, functioning courts, open transport routes and political negotiations that do not reward armed control of territory. Without those conditions, resettlement becomes a wager with human lives.
Five deaths will not command the international attention given to India’s wars of diplomacy or trade. They should. Manipur shows what happens when mass displacement becomes permanent and a government learns to live with segregated violence. Saturday’s gunfire and Sunday’s recoveries are not an isolated flare-up. They are the latest proof that the war never ended—and that its boundaries are still expanding.
Sources: Reuters; The Economic Times; Times of India; and Human Rights Watch.



Comments